China Plummets in 2026. These 3 ETFs Offer a Dip Buy in Emerging Markets

Quick Read

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has experienced a significant decline of 17% year-to-date, with its portfolio heavily concentrated in 30 Chinese internet companies. Alibaba and Tencent are the top holdings, representing 12.2% and 10.8% of the fund, respectively. In contrast, iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) has only dropped 7% year-to-date due to its diversified exposure across various sectors such as banking, energy, and consumer goods, including names like China Construction Bank and PetroChina. Additionally, iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) offers a yield of 5.4% from sovereign debt across emerging markets, despite a 2% decline year-to-date caused by rising Treasury yields.

The current economic environment is challenging for emerging market investments. Rising U.S. Treasury yields are putting pressure on bond prices, while China’s equity ETFs face regulatory and geopolitical headwinds. This creates a decision point for investors: whether to go for concentrated internet exposure through KWEB, diversified Chinese equities via MCHI, or income-focused emerging markets bonds through EMB, depending on their risk tolerance and return expectations.

If you’re focused on selecting the right stocks and ETFs, you might be missing out on a more critical aspect of investing—retirement income. The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income was created to address this very issue, and it’s available for free today. Learn more here.

Emerging markets have always been difficult to navigate, and 2026 is no exception. China-focused equity ETFs have seen sharp declines year-to-date, while rising U.S. Treasury yields are creating challenges for EM bonds. For investors who believe in the long-term potential of global growth outside the U.S., these market dislocations have historically preceded periods of recovery, though predicting when that recovery will occur has never been straightforward. Below are three funds that offer distinct ways to access this investment thesis.

Pure-Play China Internet: The Highest-Conviction Bet on the Sector

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (NYSEARCA:KWEB) is the most direct way for investors to gain concentrated exposure to China’s internet economy. This fund tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index and holds only companies primarily engaged in internet or internet-related activities, covering e-commerce, social media, online gaming, fintech, and digital logistics.

The portfolio consists of approximately 30 holdings, with Alibaba Group Holding at 12.2% and Tencent Holdings at 10.8% as the top positions. Other notable holdings include PDD Holdings at 6.9%, Meituan at 6.6%, and Trip.com Group at 4.7%. Sector-wise, Consumer Discretionary accounts for 42.3% of the fund, and Communication Services for 40.7%, meaning nearly the entire portfolio is tied to consumer spending and digital engagement.

With $8 billion in total net assets and an expense ratio of 0.70%, KWEB is competitive for a specialized single-country sector fund. Its dividend yield is near 6.7%, although this reflects distributions from underlying holdings rather than a deliberate income strategy.

The tradeoff for this concentration is volatility. KWEB is down nearly 17% year-to-date and has lost over 54% over five years. That five-year figure includes the 2021 regulatory crackdown on Chinese tech and the subsequent recovery. Investors choosing this fund are making an explicit bet on the internet sector, with all the associated policy, regulatory, and geopolitical risks. The concentrated mandate leaves no cushion from energy, financials, or state-owned enterprises when sentiment turns.

Broad China Exposure With a Diversified Floor

Where KWEB focuses entirely on the internet sector, iShares MSCI China ETF (NYSEARCA:MCHI) spreads its exposure across the full Chinese equity market. Managed by BlackRock and tracking the MSCI China Index, this fund covers large and mid-cap Chinese companies across every major sector, including technology, financials, energy, consumer, and healthcare.

The holdings clearly reflect this broad approach. Tencent is the top position at 16.35%, and internet names familiar from KWEB appear here as well, such as PDD, Meituan, Baidu, JD.com, and NetEase. However, the fund also includes names like China Construction Bank, Bank of China, PetroChina, Zijin Mining, and BYD. This mix of tech giants and state-owned enterprises makes MCHI structurally different from KWEB. When Chinese internet stocks face regulatory pressure, the banks and energy companies in MCHI can partially offset the damage.

With $7.4 billion in assets and an expense ratio of 0.59%, MCHI is one of the more cost-efficient options for broad Chinese equity exposure. Its low portfolio turnover of 12% confirms its passive, index-tracking approach. This means the fund is not actively trading around Chinese policy shifts; it simply holds the market.

The performance difference between MCHI and KWEB is instructive. MCHI is down about 7% year-to-date compared to KWEB’s nearly 17% decline. Over one year, MCHI is actually up about 2%, while KWEB is down 16%. This gap illustrates the impact of diversification in a volatile single-country environment. The tradeoff is that MCHI will underperform KWEB during a strong internet rally since the sector represents a smaller slice of the portfolio.

Investors seeking China equity exposure but uncomfortable with concentrating entirely in tech will find MCHI a more defensible position. Those who believe the internet sector is where China’s growth story plays out may find it too diluted.

Emerging Markets Income Without the Equity Swings

The first two funds on this list are equity plays on China specifically. iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:EMB) offers something different: income-oriented exposure to the broader emerging markets growth story, denominated in U.S. dollars and backed by sovereign and quasi-sovereign government bonds.

The fund tracks the J.P. Morgan EMBI Global Core Index and holds USD-denominated government debt from issuers across Latin America, Asia, Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Because the bonds are dollar-denominated, investors avoid currency risk from individual EM currencies, which is one of the primary reasons EM bond funds historically blow up. The sovereign issuer base also means the credit risk profile is different from corporate EM debt, though individual country risk remains real.

EMB holds $16.5 billion in assets and carries an expense ratio of 0.39%, making it one of the more cost-efficient ways to access this asset class. The dividend yield is approximately 5.4%, which is the primary reason income-focused investors own it. Over the past year, the fund has delivered total returns of about 8%, a clear contrast to the drawdowns in KWEB and MCHI during the same period.

The key risk to understand in the current interest rate environment is the impact of rising Treasury yields. The 10-year Treasury yield sits near 4.34%, up from a 12-month low near 3.97%. Rising Treasury yields compress the price of existing bonds, including those held by EMB. The fund is down roughly 2% year-to-date, which reflects that rate pressure. Investors collecting the yield still come out ahead over a full year, but the price volatility is real and accelerates when U.S. rates move sharply.

EMB also carries country-specific credit risk. A sovereign default or political crisis in a major issuer country can hit the fund directly, and those events are not correlated with U.S. equity market movements in any predictable way.

Which of These Three Funds Actually Fits Your Situation

KWEB is ideal for investors with a specific, high-conviction view on China’s internet sector who can tolerate sharp drawdowns in exchange for concentrated exposure to that theme. MCHI suits those who want broad Chinese equity exposure with the cushion of diversification across sectors, accepting that the highs will be lower and the lows will be higher. EMB belongs in a different conversation entirely: it is the choice for investors who want emerging markets in their portfolio but prefer income and reduced equity volatility over capital appreciation, particularly in an environment where equity uncertainty has returned.

Released: The Ultimate Guide To Retirement Income

(sponsor)

Most investors spend years learning how to pick good stocks and funds. Far fewer have a clear plan for turning those investments into a reliable retirement paycheck. The truth is, the transition from “building wealth” to “living on wealth” is one of the most overlooked risks facing successful investors in their 50s, 60s and 70s.

That is exactly what The Definitive Guide to Retirement Income was created to solve. It’s a free guide that outlines the straightforward math and strategies you need to convert your investments to income. Learn more here.